Set notation
Denoting a set as an object
When a set should refer to a an indivisible object, one typically denotes it by a single capital letter, e.g. , and then can be used to stand for that set.
When referring to an arbitrary generic set, a typical notational choice is by the letter . When several sets are under consideration, first few capitals, , etc. are used.
Set-builder notation
Another form of extensional definition is set-builder notation, also called the set comprehension. It is a compact notation to describe a set, with the general sytax lookin like: , with the colon, ":", (or sometimes, a pipe symbol, "|") standing for abstraction and being read as "such that".
For example: is read as "The set A contains all numbers of form two times x, such that x is an element of the integer set". One of the common abbreviations is to immediately specify the "type" of :
If the set comprehension contains more then one applicable rules, their relation can be spelled out in English or, more commonly, using logic symbols for negation (¬
), conjunction (∧
), disjunction (∨
or &
), implication (→
) and bijection (↔
). Generally, predicate logic is used as a language to describe sets.
Definition by predicate
Elements of a set can be specified by a predicate i.e. in terms of a property (or properties) they possess.
Whether an object possesses a certain property is either true or false (in terms of classical logic), so it can be a subject of the propositional function .
A set can be specified by a predicate function; , means that is a set to whom each , which possesses a certain property , belongs; taht is, each for which is true.
Axiom of Extensionality
If are sets then
meaning, if X and Y are sets, then, they are the same set iff they contain the same elements.
If and only if, iff: 1. if they are the same set, then they contain the same elements. 2. if they contain the same elements, then they are the same set.
Indexed sets
Last updated
Was this helpful?