Sets: Summary
inclusion relation is reflexive, transitive, and anti-symmetric
proper inclusion relation is irreflexive, transitive, and asymmetric.
inclusion and proper inclusion relations have natural converses;
A (properly) includes B iff B is (properly) included in A;
alternatively, A is a (proper) superset of B
exclusion relation is symmetric and anti-reflexive
subset is an example of inclusion relation
inclusion relation is antisymmetric
set membership (belonging) is an example of membership relation
membership (elementhood) relation is reflexive
inclusion relation is transitive, membership relation is not
Relations: Summary
(x,y) ∈ R or xRy (x is "R-related" to y)
R: X -> Y
A relation from set (domain) to set (codomain), where and , is denoted as or (x is R-related to y).
If the sets are equal, the Cartesian product, , is denoted by and a relation is
A relation is a subset of the Cartesian product,
A relation is an element of the powerset of the Cartesian product of sets,
Total number of relations of an n-element set with itself is
Sets
Cardinality of the set X is denoted by
Cardinality of the powerset of the set X is
Cardinality of the Cartasian product of the set X:
Cardinality of the powerset of the Cartasian product of the set X is
Each relation is a subset of the Cartasian product of the set X:
Each relation is an element in the powerset of the Cartasian product of the set X:
Number of all possible relations on a set:
standard set notation: curly braces for listing the elements explicitly
comprehensions:
{x ∈ S |...}∅for the empty setS \ Tfor the set difference ofSandTcardinality of a set
Sis|S|powerset of
Si.e. the set of all the subsets ofS, isP(S)the set
{0,1,2,3,4,5,...}of natural numbers is denoted by the symbolNa set is countable if its elements can be placed in one-to-one correspondence with the natural numbers
Relations
An n-place relation on a collection of sets
S1,S2,...,Snis a set
R ⊆ S1 × S2 ×...× Snof tuples of elementsS1 - Snthe elements
s1 ∈ S1throughsn ∈ Snare related byRif(s1,...,sn)is an element ofRA one-place relation on a set
Sis called a predicate onSP is true of an element
s ∈ Sifs ∈ Pwe write
P(s)instead ofs ∈ P, regardingPas a function mapping elements ofSto truth valuesA two-place relation
Ron setsSandTis a binary relationWe write
sRtinstead of(s, t) ∈ Rif
SandTare the same setU, thenRis a binary relation onU3-place or more place relations are often written using a mixfix concrete syntax, where the elements in the relation are separated by a sequence of symbols that jointly constitute the name of the relation. For example, for the typing relation for the simply typed lambda calculus, we write
Γ ⊢ s : Tto mean the triple(Γ,s,T)is in the typing relation.The domain of a relation R on sets S and T, written
dom(R), is the set of elementss ∈ Ssuch that(s, t) ∈ Rfor somet.The codomain or range of
R, writtenrange(R), is the set of elementst ∈ Tsuch that(s, t) ∈ Rfor some s
Functions
A relation R on sets S and T is called a partial function from S to T if, whenever
(s, t1) ∈ Rand(s, t2) ∈ R, we havet1 = t2.If, in addition,
dom(R) = S, then R is called a total function (or just function) from S to T.A partial function R from S to T is said to be defined on an argument
s ∈ Sifs ∈ dom(R), and undefined otherwise.We write
f (x) ↑, orf (x) =↑, to mean f is undefined on x, andf (x)↓to mean f is defined on xwe also need to define functions that may fail on some inputs, so it is important to distinguish failure (which is a legitimate, observable result) from divergence
a function that may fail can be either partial, i.e. it may also diverge, or total (it must always return a result or explicitly fail)
We write
f(x)=failwhen f returns a failure result on the input x.Formally, a function from S to T that may also fail is actually a function
from S to
T ∪ {fail}, where we assume thatfaildoes not belong to T.Suppose R is a binary relation on a set S and P is a predicate on S. P is preserved by R if whenever we have
sRs'andP(s), we also haveP(s0).
Last updated
Was this helpful?