Traditional first-order logic
In standard first-order logics:
Wffs are finite in length (although there may be infinitely many of them)
Rules of inference take only finitely many premises
There are only two truth values
Truth-values of given proposition symbols do not change within a given interpretation, only between or across interpretations
All propositional operators and connectives are truth-functional
p ∨ ¬p
is provable even if we do not have|- p
or|- ¬p
separately; that is, the principle of excluded middle holdsContradictions are always false (as opposed to being both true and false)
Contradictions imply everything (ex falsum quidlibet). If the axioms contain an inconsistency, then all wffs are theorems
|-
is monotonic - if the set of premises is enlarged, the set of derivable conclusions doesn't shrinkInferences are from wffs to wffs, or from truth-values to truth-values (by means of rules), not from meanings to meanings. Rules of inference refer to syntactic features of wffs or to semantic truth-values, but not to other semantic features beyond truth-value such as meaning or intension
There are individual variables (as opposed to none)
There are quantifiers (as opposed to none)
Predicates take only individuals as arguments (as opposed to other predicates)
Quantifiers bind only individual variables (as opposed to binding predicates)
Domains are non-empty by default, or at least one individual exists in every interpretation
Universal quantifiers lack existential import (hence, Aristotle is non-standard)
all structure inside predicates, in a natural language, is ignored (e.g. tense, adverbs, adjectives, etc.), except the order of args and quantifiers, which can help us distinguish the subject from the objects of the verb
Last updated
Was this helpful?